thomachan72
06-16 12:54 PM
Great topic. wating one more year would mean 12 more months of rent. so even if the house depreciates it would break even considering the lost rent. This is just my opinion assuming that the depreciation would be less than 5-10% till next summer. Experts please list out the hidden costs involved in mortgage for new home buyers to be careful about.
wallpaper Kim-Kardashian-Leggings-Are-
apahilaj
05-10 02:43 PM
On a seperate note, did you guys apply yourself. Do you already have a G-28 form signed for a lawyer?
I applied myself - so why do I need a G-28 from my lawyer?
I applied myself - so why do I need a G-28 from my lawyer?
gc_on_demand
09-22 02:31 PM
GOOD NEWS
09/23/2008
Full Committee
1:00 P.M. in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building
Continued Committee Markup of: H.R. 6598, H.R. 5882, H.R. 5924, H.R. 5950, and
To consider: a resolution and report recommending to the Hous of Representatives that Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey be cited for contempt of Congress
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html
I called all reps but still dont see any news related to schedule on calendar. Tried diff browser and cleard cache.
09/23/2008
Full Committee
1:00 P.M. in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building
Continued Committee Markup of: H.R. 6598, H.R. 5882, H.R. 5924, H.R. 5950, and
To consider: a resolution and report recommending to the Hous of Representatives that Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey be cited for contempt of Congress
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html
I called all reps but still dont see any news related to schedule on calendar. Tried diff browser and cleard cache.
2011 fat people in leggings.
kishorek111
11-12 04:22 PM
asking for donations is nothing wrong. After all Immigration voice is for everyone's benefit.
At the same time, keeping everything transparent is IV's duty. IV should not wait for someone to ask these details...
At the same time, keeping everything transparent is IV's duty. IV should not wait for someone to ask these details...
more...
JAYASURESH
10-14 07:52 PM
every drops count!! there is no single solution that would buyout all the foreclosures. Immigration is one of the major factors in fueling the economy.. folks, dont tell me that the legal immigration took away the jobs of an american.. may be one or two cases, most of the cases employers could not find any US people to fill ( high tech jobs). Letting the current non-immigrants to have GC, is not going to take away the new jobs.. all these non-immigrants are already in good paying Jobs.
vin13
09-22 11:38 AM
we have tried our best and still trying....Now i have come to peace thinking that it is all fate.....it doesnt matter how much hard work you did...all it matters is fate
more...
bazuka6
02-10 04:07 PM
It is time again for setting expectations before the bulletin is released and then see it shattered like a glass falling on the floor :) Anyway here are my expectations:
MARCH 2008 VISA BULLETIN
-----------------------------
EB3-ROW March 2003
EB3-INDIA June 2001 (sorry had high hopes last time)
EB2-ROW C
EB2-INDIA June 2001 (change from U - Unavailable)
Please feel free to predict your expectations.
How can EB-2 India move if USCIS has already said that all visa numbers for FY have been used up ? It's supposed to remian U until Oct 08
EB-3 India - Most likely Dec 01
MARCH 2008 VISA BULLETIN
-----------------------------
EB3-ROW March 2003
EB3-INDIA June 2001 (sorry had high hopes last time)
EB2-ROW C
EB2-INDIA June 2001 (change from U - Unavailable)
Please feel free to predict your expectations.
How can EB-2 India move if USCIS has already said that all visa numbers for FY have been used up ? It's supposed to remian U until Oct 08
EB-3 India - Most likely Dec 01
2010 fat people in leggings. I hate Jeggings and Leggings
vin13
05-13 10:35 AM
I would go with the prediction in the Jan 2010 Visa Bulletin:
WHAT ARE THE PROJECTIONS FOR CUT-OFF DATE MOVEMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCES FOR THE REMAINDER OF FY-2010?
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:
Employment Second:
China: July through October 2005................CHINA IS ALREADY AT NOV 2005...SO THIS HAS HAPPENED
India: February through early March 2005.........ONE MONTH BEHIND HERE....NOT BAD WITH THE PREDICTION
If Section 202(a)(5)were to apply:
China and India: October through December 2005 ..................THIS IS THE SPILLOVER CHANCES FOR JULY-SEPT 2010....MOST LIKELY IT WILL CLOSE AT JAN 1, 2006
I tend to agree with you. Projections by DOS seems to be closer to reality.
I would stay conservative contrary to many other predictions.
1) China moving to Nov 2005 is a good thing for India. This means India will get all the remaining fall-down/fall-across numbers until priority date reaches Nov 2005. After that both India and China will share and move the dates by a month or so. This should get India to Dec 2005 to Jan 2006.
2) Many see the dates have not moved much for so many months. So they can be skeptical about the date movements in the last few months. The reason why i anticipate much larger movements in the final months is due to the fact that India gets about 3 times more visas through fall-across/fall-down than what is alloted for just India.
2009 info
Country cap for Eb-2 - aprox. 2800
2009 India for Eb-2 was 10,116.
fall-down/fall-across numbers 10,116 - 2800 = aprox. 7316
So we can see that visa movement for India (Eb-2) is greatly influenced by the number of fall-down/fall-across which seem to happen mostly in the last quarter.
WHAT ARE THE PROJECTIONS FOR CUT-OFF DATE MOVEMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCES FOR THE REMAINDER OF FY-2010?
Based on current indications of demand, the best case scenarios for cut-off dates which will be reached by the end of FY-2010 are as follows:
Employment Second:
China: July through October 2005................CHINA IS ALREADY AT NOV 2005...SO THIS HAS HAPPENED
India: February through early March 2005.........ONE MONTH BEHIND HERE....NOT BAD WITH THE PREDICTION
If Section 202(a)(5)were to apply:
China and India: October through December 2005 ..................THIS IS THE SPILLOVER CHANCES FOR JULY-SEPT 2010....MOST LIKELY IT WILL CLOSE AT JAN 1, 2006
I tend to agree with you. Projections by DOS seems to be closer to reality.
I would stay conservative contrary to many other predictions.
1) China moving to Nov 2005 is a good thing for India. This means India will get all the remaining fall-down/fall-across numbers until priority date reaches Nov 2005. After that both India and China will share and move the dates by a month or so. This should get India to Dec 2005 to Jan 2006.
2) Many see the dates have not moved much for so many months. So they can be skeptical about the date movements in the last few months. The reason why i anticipate much larger movements in the final months is due to the fact that India gets about 3 times more visas through fall-across/fall-down than what is alloted for just India.
2009 info
Country cap for Eb-2 - aprox. 2800
2009 India for Eb-2 was 10,116.
fall-down/fall-across numbers 10,116 - 2800 = aprox. 7316
So we can see that visa movement for India (Eb-2) is greatly influenced by the number of fall-down/fall-across which seem to happen mostly in the last quarter.
more...
letstalklc
07-10 10:21 AM
ah - never mind - i see it now, after one logs in! :)
yes, one have to be login in order to give red/green.
yes, one have to be login in order to give red/green.
hair leggings
belmontboy
11-24 07:11 PM
For the August visa bulletin, USCIS gave all the extra quota to EB2. I don't think this is fair for all the EB3 people. I thougt the reason they gave all the quota to them was the EB2 included NIW. But NIW is just a small portion of EB2. Majority EB2 peopole are like EB3 working for companies and not necessarily important to give all the extra quota to them. If the policy continues, our EB3 will just become fake immigration. You don't know how long we can finalize our case. Gugs, please work together and let our voice to be heard by USCIS. Hope our organization can help us.
Fairness in immigration is a myth dude.
While we understand the plight of EB3 folks, EB2 ain't better either.
Have you ever read moral stories about "Unity is strength"?
We should focus on collective efforts to get Visa recapture, preparing for DC rally rather than rant on spill over topic!!
Fairness in immigration is a myth dude.
While we understand the plight of EB3 folks, EB2 ain't better either.
Have you ever read moral stories about "Unity is strength"?
We should focus on collective efforts to get Visa recapture, preparing for DC rally rather than rant on spill over topic!!
more...
alinaturkova
01-15 12:48 PM
This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements.
You need to *prove* that you have no intention for immigrating to US. Your intention is within your head; it does not start from any given date or given action by USCIS. The IO needs to "read your mind". The legal standard is that the court concedes that no one can know for sure what one's intentions are, however, the immigration officer can make a reasonable guess at the intentions by observing the actions you took or someone else took on your behalf.
In your case:
1. Someone filed I-130 for you. This is for permanent immigration to US.
2. You have family ties in US.
3. You have traveled to US before (I do not know how frequently).
4. You want to join a university that does not even have your major; that too you do not know what exactly you will study in that university. This itself is a very strong indication (at least in my mind) that you are not really interested in the education, but you applied to that university just for coming to US.
All together, it shows a clear pattern of observable evidence that your intention is to immigrate to US.
Thank you for your response raysaikat! Could you please rephrase your first part of the answer "This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements."? It's a bit confusing.
You're saying I need to *prove* that I have no intention for immigrating to US. Do you mean that they must clearly see that I have no intention to stay in the US after I finish college? The I-130 form is pending so it's obvious I have such intentions. However, the process takes a very long time. Do you think that if I prove that I plan to go back home after school and then wait for the process in my home country I'll be issued a visa? Do they have information regarding the "I-130" process in their database? I mean there is a chance they don't even ask about it. Well, last time we applied they didn't.
Also, do you think that my previous false response to the application form question could in some way affect my I-130 process? I mean I've returned back so in my understanding it shouldn't be a problem. Please explain.
If I get lucky and get a visa issued. What happens next? Is it easy to switch to a working "H1B" visa from "F-1" visa and maintain this status until the end of the "I-130" process? I mean switching to "H1B" after I finish college. Is it ok to leave the country while on "H1B" status while "I-130" pending? Please comment. Thank you.
You need to *prove* that you have no intention for immigrating to US. Your intention is within your head; it does not start from any given date or given action by USCIS. The IO needs to "read your mind". The legal standard is that the court concedes that no one can know for sure what one's intentions are, however, the immigration officer can make a reasonable guess at the intentions by observing the actions you took or someone else took on your behalf.
In your case:
1. Someone filed I-130 for you. This is for permanent immigration to US.
2. You have family ties in US.
3. You have traveled to US before (I do not know how frequently).
4. You want to join a university that does not even have your major; that too you do not know what exactly you will study in that university. This itself is a very strong indication (at least in my mind) that you are not really interested in the education, but you applied to that university just for coming to US.
All together, it shows a clear pattern of observable evidence that your intention is to immigrate to US.
Thank you for your response raysaikat! Could you please rephrase your first part of the answer "This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements."? It's a bit confusing.
You're saying I need to *prove* that I have no intention for immigrating to US. Do you mean that they must clearly see that I have no intention to stay in the US after I finish college? The I-130 form is pending so it's obvious I have such intentions. However, the process takes a very long time. Do you think that if I prove that I plan to go back home after school and then wait for the process in my home country I'll be issued a visa? Do they have information regarding the "I-130" process in their database? I mean there is a chance they don't even ask about it. Well, last time we applied they didn't.
Also, do you think that my previous false response to the application form question could in some way affect my I-130 process? I mean I've returned back so in my understanding it shouldn't be a problem. Please explain.
If I get lucky and get a visa issued. What happens next? Is it easy to switch to a working "H1B" visa from "F-1" visa and maintain this status until the end of the "I-130" process? I mean switching to "H1B" after I finish college. Is it ok to leave the country while on "H1B" status while "I-130" pending? Please comment. Thank you.
hot fat people in leggings.
champu
02-19 03:35 PM
This money may be yours if it route back to Indian Govt but guess what? None of the politician wants to do that reason is ..............corruption my dear friend.
We should use this money for stimulus...
We should use this money for stimulus...
more...
house Curvy Celebs in Leggings:
sai
02-28 12:57 PM
One quick addition.
Consider the fact that you have to be in a project all the time (no bench pay) or else you are eating away your savings.
Consider the fact that you have to be in a project all the time (no bench pay) or else you are eating away your savings.
tattoo 2) Leggings.
zj142
07-10 09:01 PM
They probably figured out that accepting those application is actually a better deal comparing with settling a lawsuit with ALIF.
more...
pictures and having people see the
ashkam
07-20 01:04 PM
Vaishu,
I have a question for you. I had lost my birth certificated and fortunately my father was visiting us so I get an affidavit signed by him. My mother is no more and my siblings are in India. Would there be a problem as I sent an affidavit in lieu of birth cert with just my father's signature? Please let me know.
Uncle or aunt's affidavit would have done as well. But you cannot send just one.
I have a question for you. I had lost my birth certificated and fortunately my father was visiting us so I get an affidavit signed by him. My mother is no more and my siblings are in India. Would there be a problem as I sent an affidavit in lieu of birth cert with just my father's signature? Please let me know.
Uncle or aunt's affidavit would have done as well. But you cannot send just one.
dresses Not to be confused with tights
hopefullegalimmigrant
04-16 11:50 AM
JOb title/Description is significantly similar. I will inform USCIS. I am really glad we have this option so we can make choices on what is the best place to work for us rather than get beat up by fate and long timelines and stick to someplace where one is not happy or progressing anywhere. My downside is I have to sell my house :(
more...
makeup fat people in leggings.
number30
04-09 05:54 PM
You are right axp817, but small correction.
Company A (old company) attorney filed I 485 based on the I-140 approval from
company A.
If there was offer letter from company A you can safely say that job was for future. If you did not include a letter from company A then all goes by the argument of future employment. But Finally it should be OK.
Company A (old company) attorney filed I 485 based on the I-140 approval from
company A.
If there was offer letter from company A you can safely say that job was for future. If you did not include a letter from company A then all goes by the argument of future employment. But Finally it should be OK.
girlfriend I#39;ve been collecting people#39;s
JazzByTheBay
09-20 07:25 PM
Citizenship comes 5 years later, if one's interested (and may not be everyone's goal).
Singing a country's national anthem is also different than taking the pledge of allegiance (the latter means you are pledging your loyalty to the United States):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
Having said that, excellent job Pankaj!! You had the crowds mesmerized!
jazz
Everyone here aspires to be a future citizen of the United States of America. If GC process didn't have problems, we would already have been citizens. Those who haven't learn't to sing it, should do so soon. It can be asked in the naturalization quiz.
Singing a country's national anthem is also different than taking the pledge of allegiance (the latter means you are pledging your loyalty to the United States):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
Having said that, excellent job Pankaj!! You had the crowds mesmerized!
jazz
Everyone here aspires to be a future citizen of the United States of America. If GC process didn't have problems, we would already have been citizens. Those who haven't learn't to sing it, should do so soon. It can be asked in the naturalization quiz.
hairstyles fat people in leggings.
lazycis
12-19 03:41 PM
1. If I-140 is not yet approved and withdrawn, you lose I-485/AP/EAD.
2. I am not sure why they cannot file a second I-140 based on PERM LC right away. Seems to be a no-brainer to me. Must be one of those lawyer things :)
http://www.hooyou.com/eb-1/faq.html
Q: Is it possible to file two petitions, such as an EB-1(a) and NIW, at the same time?
A: Yes. Some of our clients file two I-140 petitions simultaneously. Some clients file three I-140 petitions at the same time. There is nothing stated in the law that prohibits multiple filings. Multiple filings increase your chances of approval.
2. I am not sure why they cannot file a second I-140 based on PERM LC right away. Seems to be a no-brainer to me. Must be one of those lawyer things :)
http://www.hooyou.com/eb-1/faq.html
Q: Is it possible to file two petitions, such as an EB-1(a) and NIW, at the same time?
A: Yes. Some of our clients file two I-140 petitions simultaneously. Some clients file three I-140 petitions at the same time. There is nothing stated in the law that prohibits multiple filings. Multiple filings increase your chances of approval.
Prophet
05-17 07:44 PM
:D sorry, habit - used to be a really active member of a forum for a game - got turned moderator aftr a lil wile as wel!
nope, **** good english on site tho... well... after i replace the placeholder gobbledegook!! (eg. "bnusiksfb" to check evrythings werkin ;) )
so ne word on wat my sql can actually b used for (i mean in greater detail) and y its so highly spoken of in these here forum parts? ;)
Prophet.
nope, **** good english on site tho... well... after i replace the placeholder gobbledegook!! (eg. "bnusiksfb" to check evrythings werkin ;) )
so ne word on wat my sql can actually b used for (i mean in greater detail) and y its so highly spoken of in these here forum parts? ;)
Prophet.
gimme Green!!
07-13 03:36 PM
Hail Lou Dobbs!
Hell Lou Dobbs?
Hell Lou Dobbs?