gc_bucs
02-28 09:44 PM
Thanks to the IV team for their time and efforts.
I picked up the following from http://www.immigration-law.com/
Report indicates that more and more state governors come forward to urge support of Comprehensive Immigration Reform. It appears that this is particularly noticeable in the western states. There has been Governors conference for the last few days and reportedly the Utah Governor Jon Huntsman Jr. and Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano asked Western governors to:
* Oppose blanket amnesty to all undocumented workers and support "appropriate sanctions" for those breaking the law.
* Urge Congress to avoid creating incentives for more illegal immigration by "creating unnecessary hurdles and lengthy delays" for those wishing to immigrate legally.
* Call for full funding for law enforcement and security along the southern U.S. border, enforcement using "cutting-edge" technology, better coordination with law enforcement agents and construction of a federal correctional facility to house illegal immigrants convicted in state courts as well as reimbursement to states for incarcerating illegal immigrants.
* Request full funding for processing employment-based visas; eliminating visa-request backlogs and increasing the number of visas to meet U.S. industry needs, especially in high-tech, bio-tech and seasonal-based industries.
* Establish a guest worker program that will include background checks to help supply workers where there are shortages.
* Enforce sanctions against employers for hiring illegal immigrants along with a system for employers to verify citizenship and worker status.
I picked up the following from http://www.immigration-law.com/
Report indicates that more and more state governors come forward to urge support of Comprehensive Immigration Reform. It appears that this is particularly noticeable in the western states. There has been Governors conference for the last few days and reportedly the Utah Governor Jon Huntsman Jr. and Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano asked Western governors to:
* Oppose blanket amnesty to all undocumented workers and support "appropriate sanctions" for those breaking the law.
* Urge Congress to avoid creating incentives for more illegal immigration by "creating unnecessary hurdles and lengthy delays" for those wishing to immigrate legally.
* Call for full funding for law enforcement and security along the southern U.S. border, enforcement using "cutting-edge" technology, better coordination with law enforcement agents and construction of a federal correctional facility to house illegal immigrants convicted in state courts as well as reimbursement to states for incarcerating illegal immigrants.
* Request full funding for processing employment-based visas; eliminating visa-request backlogs and increasing the number of visas to meet U.S. industry needs, especially in high-tech, bio-tech and seasonal-based industries.
* Establish a guest worker program that will include background checks to help supply workers where there are shortages.
* Enforce sanctions against employers for hiring illegal immigrants along with a system for employers to verify citizenship and worker status.
wallpaper Natalie Portman: Bad Hair
irha
12-06 07:20 PM
Its the courtesy of USCIS and highlighting of our problems by IV made USCIS to issue cards for 2 years... there is no requirement that it should be as such... in general any EAD unless its L* is generally issued for 1 year with exception of C09-employment category where they are issued in looking at Priority date [ofcourse there are other exceptions like asylum... etc] if they dont get biometrics from their repository at the time of printing , they waive some of the features like fingerprint, signature etc.
Thanks for the explanation, now I understand why my wife got only 1yr validity, where as I got 2yr. In reality my wife got only 11 months validity, as the from date started a month before we actually received it in the mail. It is a big pain and expense to renew every 11 months, if this is the case. Another gripe is that my validity started 2 months before the current one expired, effectively reducing the 2yr to 1yr and 10 months. It still better than 1yr, but I don't understand why they get simple things like this wrong.
It is funny that I used to wait until the last minute to renew my car registration when I first arrived in the US, thinking I would loose time, but when I learned that that is not the case, I started registering at my convenience. Since EAD renewal is not as simple, we tend to apply early, and that results in getting some time lost. How early do you normally apply?
Thanks for the explanation, now I understand why my wife got only 1yr validity, where as I got 2yr. In reality my wife got only 11 months validity, as the from date started a month before we actually received it in the mail. It is a big pain and expense to renew every 11 months, if this is the case. Another gripe is that my validity started 2 months before the current one expired, effectively reducing the 2yr to 1yr and 10 months. It still better than 1yr, but I don't understand why they get simple things like this wrong.
It is funny that I used to wait until the last minute to renew my car registration when I first arrived in the US, thinking I would loose time, but when I learned that that is not the case, I started registering at my convenience. Since EAD renewal is not as simple, we tend to apply early, and that results in getting some time lost. How early do you normally apply?
senthil
02-05 01:10 PM
the word "returning worker" makes more sense to me and its the right word to express who you are in two words- rather than story telling.
i would assume, unless they ask for your status details we dont need to talk about it. just shoe the latest 797 approvaland you should be all set. am i right?
i was asking for people who are going on H1B's , especially after their 6 years of regular H1B timeframe and who are at some stage of GC process. thanks.
i would assume, unless they ask for your status details we dont need to talk about it. just shoe the latest 797 approvaland you should be all set. am i right?
i was asking for people who are going on H1B's , especially after their 6 years of regular H1B timeframe and who are at some stage of GC process. thanks.
2011 Dramatic: Try out Natalie Portman#39;s eerie make-up in Oscar-winning Black
acecupid
07-02 05:54 PM
Guys, I think we should have some media coverage for the USCIS and DOS actions. Since immigration news has been hot in the media for a while. It will be easy to get channels to cover this story.
Send emails to news channels to cover the story. You can quote the story from AILA
Administration Slams Door on Thousands of Legal Immigrants: AILA Condemns Agencies� Bait and Switch
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07070264 (posted Jul. 2, 2007)"
CONTACT: George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The American Immigration Lawyers Association strongly condemns the bait and switch perpetrated by the federal government on thousands of intending immigrants who have waited in line for years and were following the rules for obtaining a "green card."
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. State Department announced that, as of July 2, individuals seeking permanent residence ("green cards") through employer sponsorship finally would be allowed to proceed with their applications. Applicants would have a short window, possibly only through July or perhaps August, to complete their paperwork.
Those intending immigrants, immediately and at great expense, rushed to gather final documents, complete their paperwork and obtain required medical exams. Many sent their applications off on Friday, June 29 for arrival on July 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, for the last phase of the multi-step process that leads to a green card.
However, on the very day the door was to open, DOS and DHS slammed it shut.
On July 2, DHS and DOS announced-based on no different information than they had on June 13 when they announced the opening of this filing door-that all applications would be turned away.
"People ask why those who come to the United States illegally can't just follow the rules," said Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "But here people followed the rules and did everything right, yet without warning or explanation the door was slammed in their faces. This hoax perpetrated by these two government agencies is unconscionable, and is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken."
AILA calls on the Administration to do the right thing and keep its promise to the people affected by this sudden reversal. AILA also calls on Congress to get it right this time and fix our badly broken system.
================================================== ========
GENERAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
America's Newsroom � AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com
The Beltway Boys � Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson � Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears � Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin' In � Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business � Cavuto@foxnews.com
FNC iMag � Fncimag@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX � Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends � Friends@foxnews.com
FOX Fan Central � YourComments@foxnews.com
FOX News Live � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby � Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials � Fncspecials@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday � FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch � Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith � Foxreport@foxnews.com
FOX Report Weekend � Foxreport@foxnews.com
Geraldo at Large � Atlarge@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes � Hannity@foxnews.com OR Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich � Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report � JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup � Lineup@foxnews.com
The Live Desk w/ Martha MacCallum � Martha@foxnews.com
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren � Ontherecord@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor � Oreilly@foxnews.com
Red Eye � Redeye@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume � Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith � Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North � Comments@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto � Cavuto@foxnews.com
WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, today@nbc.com, wt@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com, Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com
Send emails to news channels to cover the story. You can quote the story from AILA
Administration Slams Door on Thousands of Legal Immigrants: AILA Condemns Agencies� Bait and Switch
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07070264 (posted Jul. 2, 2007)"
CONTACT: George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The American Immigration Lawyers Association strongly condemns the bait and switch perpetrated by the federal government on thousands of intending immigrants who have waited in line for years and were following the rules for obtaining a "green card."
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. State Department announced that, as of July 2, individuals seeking permanent residence ("green cards") through employer sponsorship finally would be allowed to proceed with their applications. Applicants would have a short window, possibly only through July or perhaps August, to complete their paperwork.
Those intending immigrants, immediately and at great expense, rushed to gather final documents, complete their paperwork and obtain required medical exams. Many sent their applications off on Friday, June 29 for arrival on July 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, for the last phase of the multi-step process that leads to a green card.
However, on the very day the door was to open, DOS and DHS slammed it shut.
On July 2, DHS and DOS announced-based on no different information than they had on June 13 when they announced the opening of this filing door-that all applications would be turned away.
"People ask why those who come to the United States illegally can't just follow the rules," said Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "But here people followed the rules and did everything right, yet without warning or explanation the door was slammed in their faces. This hoax perpetrated by these two government agencies is unconscionable, and is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken."
AILA calls on the Administration to do the right thing and keep its promise to the people affected by this sudden reversal. AILA also calls on Congress to get it right this time and fix our badly broken system.
================================================== ========
GENERAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
America's Newsroom � AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com
The Beltway Boys � Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson � Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears � Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin' In � Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business � Cavuto@foxnews.com
FNC iMag � Fncimag@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX � Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends � Friends@foxnews.com
FOX Fan Central � YourComments@foxnews.com
FOX News Live � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby � Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials � Fncspecials@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday � FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch � Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith � Foxreport@foxnews.com
FOX Report Weekend � Foxreport@foxnews.com
Geraldo at Large � Atlarge@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes � Hannity@foxnews.com OR Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich � Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report � JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup � Lineup@foxnews.com
The Live Desk w/ Martha MacCallum � Martha@foxnews.com
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren � Ontherecord@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor � Oreilly@foxnews.com
Red Eye � Redeye@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume � Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith � Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North � Comments@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto � Cavuto@foxnews.com
WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, today@nbc.com, wt@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com, Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com
more...
ebizash
07-16 03:51 PM
No I guess it is just the routine processing, may be pre-adjudication. My attorney mentioned getting a few RFE on other cases without any new petition / AC-21.
watzgc
04-22 06:06 PM
can you please let me know what RFE was about, PM me if you dont want it to be public.Its more than 7 months for me too.
I just read your message, RFE asking for Contracts and W-2 for last 2 years.
We replied to RFE still waiting for approval.
I just read your message, RFE asking for Contracts and W-2 for last 2 years.
We replied to RFE still waiting for approval.
more...
getgc2008
08-31 09:05 PM
I am on a similar situation. Approved on Aug 3rd. Got a approval notice I-485 in post. Called USCIS and they mentioned to wait till Sep 3rd and if I do not get the card to call back after sep 3rd.
Let's wait for another 3 days and will update what happens.
Let's wait for another 3 days and will update what happens.
2010 2010 Natalie Portman makes
pmb76
07-15 03:16 AM
Actions speak louder than words... Lou Dobbs says Microsoft has waged war against the American middleclass by taking the company to Canada. But that hasn't stopped the company from starting a development center in Canada, nor has the company cared to answer Lou Dobbs in a press release or anything. What I am saying is, we should not care about what Lou Dobbs thinks or says on his show. As long as we being here helps grow the American economy, nobody cares about what Lou Dobbs thinks!!!
Maybe you and I don't care what Lou Dobbs thinks since we already know what the truth is. How about that average family who are oblivious to our situation ? They just watch network television and dare not question the facts because it is coming from CNN and Lou Dobbs.
To the average American H1-B visas almost mean outsourcing American jobs. The reason for this is the misinformation perpetrated by the mainstream media. We stand to lose a lot if we don't counter it. It is necessary to be LOUD and CLEAR and tell them that they are wrong.
Our silence will just reek of acceptance. All the information dispersed by these self-anointed saviors of the American middle-class, will become the truth and we will become the culprits - the so called outsourcers of American jobs. To some extent we already have acquired that reputation.
Maybe you and I don't care what Lou Dobbs thinks since we already know what the truth is. How about that average family who are oblivious to our situation ? They just watch network television and dare not question the facts because it is coming from CNN and Lou Dobbs.
To the average American H1-B visas almost mean outsourcing American jobs. The reason for this is the misinformation perpetrated by the mainstream media. We stand to lose a lot if we don't counter it. It is necessary to be LOUD and CLEAR and tell them that they are wrong.
Our silence will just reek of acceptance. All the information dispersed by these self-anointed saviors of the American middle-class, will become the truth and we will become the culprits - the so called outsourcers of American jobs. To some extent we already have acquired that reputation.
more...
gjoe
08-14 03:30 PM
With due respect, Can you please tell me why it will fail?
Are you going to go there and ask for more visas or ask them to move the dates forward?
Are you going to go there and ask for more visas or ask them to move the dates forward?
hair natalie portman short hair.
lord_labaku
01-11 12:15 AM
I have been there. done that. As soon as ported labor applicant using AC21 moves on & finally gets his GC, his labor cannot be ported anymore; even though you filed to use his labor before he obtained his/her GC.
Mind you, I used labor substitute not from a shady consulting company but from a reputed nasdaq listed company & had top lawyers appealing and proving my case. No use.
I think AC21 & labor substitution fundamentally had these issues where they could not co-exist. Since labor substitution was prone to abuse anyway. It was done away with. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say. Just I had to spend 3 years in limbo. What can I say - only solace is that there are others who are worse of than me.
Move on. Theres no point appealing this denial of I140.
Mind you, I used labor substitute not from a shady consulting company but from a reputed nasdaq listed company & had top lawyers appealing and proving my case. No use.
I think AC21 & labor substitution fundamentally had these issues where they could not co-exist. Since labor substitution was prone to abuse anyway. It was done away with. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say. Just I had to spend 3 years in limbo. What can I say - only solace is that there are others who are worse of than me.
Move on. Theres no point appealing this denial of I140.
more...
stucklabor
06-19 08:00 AM
The FBI name check is not a side problem that once we finish fighting other problems, let's come back and pick up another problem. This is one of the major obstacles in the GC and Citizenship process which unfortunately is not transparent and there is no data available to tell you when you will pass this obstacle. If the attitude of some of the members in this organization is the delay in FBI name check is not going to happen to them and it is only random and a side problem, think again and watch out for what will be coming your way. By no means, this is not a side problem, this is one of those hidden obstacles that you don't know it is in your way once you hit it...and once you hit it, you are stuck. There is no congressman, senator or individual to help you. If we are going to be united and make the GC process transparent, we should not hand pick some of the problems that we want to fight today and come back to other problems later. You are going to soon realize how gigantic the delay with FBI name check is.
Franklin: Just to clarify, the name check effort is a private effort of Logiclife, who is one of the moderators.
Sroym: Name check not being on IV's official agenda has nothing to do with member nationalities. It is a case of greatest good for the greatest number. 200,000 people - 20% of all the green cards issued last year - are in name check. Since EB immigrants are about 20% of the total green cards, only about 40K EB immigrants are in name check. Compare that with the 250K people stuck in retrogression and 200K people in the Labor cert backlog centers.
Sroym, I understand you posted in good faith, but PM a moderator first, please, to get the facts.
Franklin: Just to clarify, the name check effort is a private effort of Logiclife, who is one of the moderators.
Sroym: Name check not being on IV's official agenda has nothing to do with member nationalities. It is a case of greatest good for the greatest number. 200,000 people - 20% of all the green cards issued last year - are in name check. Since EB immigrants are about 20% of the total green cards, only about 40K EB immigrants are in name check. Compare that with the 250K people stuck in retrogression and 200K people in the Labor cert backlog centers.
Sroym, I understand you posted in good faith, but PM a moderator first, please, to get the facts.
hot Portman puts her hair up,
cc123
09-25 12:41 PM
Mine took 8 days after the online status changed to approved-so don't worry. It's funny, on their website, they said documents mailed on sept 10, but i rcvd them on sept 17th. When i rcvd the AP, i realized the documents were mailed on sept 13-sept -- so don't blindly trust what is online.
There was a black line---uscis printer completely screwed up-and the first line of the address on mailing envelope and the address was completely un-readable. I am not sure how we even got it in mail.
There was a black line---uscis printer completely screwed up-and the first line of the address on mailing envelope and the address was completely un-readable. I am not sure how we even got it in mail.
more...
house Natalie Portman
jonty_11
05-30 05:59 PM
man uthink admins have teh time and patience to deal with folks like you....
If you really were kind enough you have teh 10 digit phone number on the Home page..CALL THEM and ask them why they banned u...It could be a mistake OR a genuine reason....
Call and find out...how do you know its coz of money...shame on you...so many of the 25K members have not paid a dime..so we should o nly have 5K odd members at that rate...So c'mon grow up and start calling lawmakers rather than sulking over stuff that has no meaning.
If you really were kind enough you have teh 10 digit phone number on the Home page..CALL THEM and ask them why they banned u...It could be a mistake OR a genuine reason....
Call and find out...how do you know its coz of money...shame on you...so many of the 25K members have not paid a dime..so we should o nly have 5K odd members at that rate...So c'mon grow up and start calling lawmakers rather than sulking over stuff that has no meaning.
tattoo Hair appt tomorrow…
samirpatel08
08-04 09:47 AM
How can I do it? I could not find an option to change it.
more...
pictures bela, flawless, hair, make up,
brb2
10-05 03:52 PM
I agree 100%. Anything that affects business and competitiveness of the US will be always more important than sob stories of individuals. Latter is collateral:)
just an idea, but the reporter should probably speak to the employers of people who have left, and highlight instances where they have found it difficult to replace the departing employee.
USCs are probably more impressed by effect on the US than the hardships faced by us
just an idea, but the reporter should probably speak to the employers of people who have left, and highlight instances where they have found it difficult to replace the departing employee.
USCs are probably more impressed by effect on the US than the hardships faced by us
dresses Natalie Portman is prettier
senk1s
06-04 01:35 AM
I read a post (sorry dont have the link) that they had juxtaposed first and last names while filling the app - called uscis and got it corrected.
You should call in with the receipt number reference and request to get it fixed
You should call in with the receipt number reference and request to get it fixed
more...
makeup Natalie Portman#39;s Golden
Valle
10-26 04:32 PM
Thanks Paskal, I fully understand now with the example of the Scarlett Letter. I need to get busy and get another waiver then. Maybe I wasnt very clear on my first post about my stauts. I had had only a first J1 from 2002 to 2005. I wanted to stay so I got a waiver that time, and I tried to get a H1B, but I couldnt get it due to expired documents that I could not get renew from my country so my H1B was denied. Now some years later I decide to come back and the only fast way to come was with another visa J1. So as you explained I need to get my case number and start my process all over again. ONce I get the waiver I will look for a new sponsor and star the H1B process all over again. I cant be very open about this because if my present sponsor realizes that I am doing waiver and everything else I may loose my J1 because I signed a contrat to work for them for 3 years and then go back home. I think it is very unfair, but that is how things work around here.
Thanks so much for your advice. Good luck to everyone in this same boat!
Thanks so much for your advice. Good luck to everyone in this same boat!
girlfriend natalie portman short hair
waitin_toolong
08-24 10:52 AM
no EAD will just be the basis for her SSN. it will just hurry up the process. What status she will be in will be determined by the I-9 form that will say H1.
hairstyles Natalie Portman puts her hair
s416504
03-18 03:53 PM
In short that forum story as follows :
On 6th Nov 2008....
He thought because of unemployment application, Two(2) Immigration Officers + One(1) State Police Officer came to my house a 6.00am in the morning questioning my �Legal Status� in this country.
But that found wrong reason as per his latest reply on 3rd Mar 2009....Immigration Officera turned to his door due to his Employer informed USCIS about his firing while revoking H1B.
Posted by jklife2006 (40) 03 Mar 2009
Hi All, Went to the Immi court today and returned just now. My lawer had prepared a wonderful document "Motion to Terminate Removal Proceedings" and Pleading document. DHS was presenet. Since there were number of attachments with evidence, the court has given a "Individual Hearing" on July 6th Monday @8:30AM. My lawyer is pretty confident and it should be fine. I am one of the rare cases. I did see the judges list on notice board and did not find even one Indian name other than mine. Will keep all posted when things progress. Thanks for the support. Sheela Murthy okayed Unemployemnt benefit. So if one wants to file, go ahead.
here is the link he is talking about
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/237011787/
On 6th Nov 2008....
He thought because of unemployment application, Two(2) Immigration Officers + One(1) State Police Officer came to my house a 6.00am in the morning questioning my �Legal Status� in this country.
But that found wrong reason as per his latest reply on 3rd Mar 2009....Immigration Officera turned to his door due to his Employer informed USCIS about his firing while revoking H1B.
Posted by jklife2006 (40) 03 Mar 2009
Hi All, Went to the Immi court today and returned just now. My lawer had prepared a wonderful document "Motion to Terminate Removal Proceedings" and Pleading document. DHS was presenet. Since there were number of attachments with evidence, the court has given a "Individual Hearing" on July 6th Monday @8:30AM. My lawyer is pretty confident and it should be fine. I am one of the rare cases. I did see the judges list on notice board and did not find even one Indian name other than mine. Will keep all posted when things progress. Thanks for the support. Sheela Murthy okayed Unemployemnt benefit. So if one wants to file, go ahead.
here is the link he is talking about
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/237011787/
kris04
07-10 01:58 AM
Anyone who had good knowledge of AC21 same/similar, please reply.
My original labor has an annual salary of 50,000. My current salary is 95,000. I got an RFE to provide EVL. My job duties are mostly similar to that of the original labor. However job title is different.
is this a problem? My attorney is saying the salary differenence will cause an issue. He is asking me to convince my HR to add a range 50,000 - 95,000 as my salary, which i am sure my HR would be against doing that as it is a big company. I don't even want to ask them since they might think i am trying to do some kind of fraud and raise a red flag.
is there anyone in the IV community who had successfully used AC21 with a considerable difference in salary?. Please respond with your comments.
How old is your labor, if the PD is somewhere around 2002, dont worry,it is better that it is more than $50 K, lesser than $50 k will create problem, as I mentioned in one of the thread my friend's labor claimed $60000, but he used AC 21 and was working sort of independent consultant for a vendor, who provided EVL when RFE came, at the time of approval he was earning $120 K. with the lack of regulation, it is grey area and each lawyer provide different advise, until a regulation is passed by USCIS it is subjective to various interpretation.
Good Luck
kris
My original labor has an annual salary of 50,000. My current salary is 95,000. I got an RFE to provide EVL. My job duties are mostly similar to that of the original labor. However job title is different.
is this a problem? My attorney is saying the salary differenence will cause an issue. He is asking me to convince my HR to add a range 50,000 - 95,000 as my salary, which i am sure my HR would be against doing that as it is a big company. I don't even want to ask them since they might think i am trying to do some kind of fraud and raise a red flag.
is there anyone in the IV community who had successfully used AC21 with a considerable difference in salary?. Please respond with your comments.
How old is your labor, if the PD is somewhere around 2002, dont worry,it is better that it is more than $50 K, lesser than $50 k will create problem, as I mentioned in one of the thread my friend's labor claimed $60000, but he used AC 21 and was working sort of independent consultant for a vendor, who provided EVL when RFE came, at the time of approval he was earning $120 K. with the lack of regulation, it is grey area and each lawyer provide different advise, until a regulation is passed by USCIS it is subjective to various interpretation.
Good Luck
kris
Vlora
10-26 09:01 AM
[QUOTE=qplearn]If the name check happens before the 485 process is cleared, great! If not, you wait for the name check; lots (and believe me tens of thousands) of people belong to the second group. Since this forum mostly has people stuck in the process at earlier stages, you are not going to find too many people with that kind of experience here. [QUOTE=qplearn]
Absolutely correct - thanks qplearn, a true senior member.
[QUOTE=qplearn] So your respected lawyer is technically correct, but what he/she is saying can be very badly misleading!! One gets the impression that clearing the name check happens automatically with completing work on the 485 by USCIS.[QUOTE=qplearn]
No, that's not what I claimed, unless my English screwed me up - (for the other readers), no one should believe that.
[QUOTE=qplearn]And the name check is certainly not a part of the 140 approval even if the 140 and 485 are submitted concurrently. If any lawyer is telling you this, please change him/her.[QUOTE=qplearn][/I]
Murthy's report (http://www.murthy.com/mb_pdf/apr2304.pdf) makes a different interpretation. My lawyer could not confirm/deny it.
I hope what I said above makes sense :) Took me a long time to compose that ...:)
Thanks qplearn, lots of useful info.
Absolutely correct - thanks qplearn, a true senior member.
[QUOTE=qplearn] So your respected lawyer is technically correct, but what he/she is saying can be very badly misleading!! One gets the impression that clearing the name check happens automatically with completing work on the 485 by USCIS.[QUOTE=qplearn]
No, that's not what I claimed, unless my English screwed me up - (for the other readers), no one should believe that.
[QUOTE=qplearn]And the name check is certainly not a part of the 140 approval even if the 140 and 485 are submitted concurrently. If any lawyer is telling you this, please change him/her.[QUOTE=qplearn][/I]
Murthy's report (http://www.murthy.com/mb_pdf/apr2304.pdf) makes a different interpretation. My lawyer could not confirm/deny it.
I hope what I said above makes sense :) Took me a long time to compose that ...:)
Thanks qplearn, lots of useful info.