pappu
08-31 08:43 AM
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan_rm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS
has some program on h1b visas undergoing.
Please call
202 737 0001
202 737 0002
202 628 0205
phone numbers to call in now (until 10 AM EST) to talk about misconceptions and problems faced by them when they apply for green cards.
has some program on h1b visas undergoing.
Please call
202 737 0001
202 737 0002
202 628 0205
phone numbers to call in now (until 10 AM EST) to talk about misconceptions and problems faced by them when they apply for green cards.
wallpaper Horse Show
andy garcia
01-23 02:42 PM
Does she need her H4 approved to have her prospective employer file the I 129? (or) Can she just provide the notice of action she received for her H4 extension filing along with her I 129 to show that she is maintaining status?
Any one??
This is what the 129 instructions specify. I think that you will have to wait until the new I94 with the new dates is issued. Hopefully she will get it before April 1.
Change of Status.
In addition to the initial evidence for the classification you are requesting, a petition requesting a change of status for an alien in the United States must be submitted with a copy of the employee's(s) Form I-94, Nonimmigrant Arrival/Departure Record.
andy
Any one??
This is what the 129 instructions specify. I think that you will have to wait until the new I94 with the new dates is issued. Hopefully she will get it before April 1.
Change of Status.
In addition to the initial evidence for the classification you are requesting, a petition requesting a change of status for an alien in the United States must be submitted with a copy of the employee's(s) Form I-94, Nonimmigrant Arrival/Departure Record.
andy
anurakt
12-14 10:49 AM
Finally I gave a thought to all this GC business and I am planning to start my Canadian PR too, here are my questions :
1. Does anybody know of any good immigration cunsulting company for Canadian PR processing ?
2. How much would be the total cost to get it done throught the consulting services ?
3. Are there any hidden costs which these companies tell you at the end and try to rip you ?
Thanks
1. Does anybody know of any good immigration cunsulting company for Canadian PR processing ?
2. How much would be the total cost to get it done throught the consulting services ?
3. Are there any hidden costs which these companies tell you at the end and try to rip you ?
Thanks
2011 A+horse
thomachan72
08-17 01:06 PM
What does your attorney say? He/she should have had some idea when they filed under EB2. The attorney should clearly not take a risk regarding educational requirements. Maybe you will have to do the MTR and submit better evaulation (if you feel the degree and experience are suitable). Best
more...
karthkc
07-16 05:14 PM
On the left upper hand corner of every post you will find 3 icons. Click on middle one and a drop down menu pops out. If you click -- I approve then its a green dot and if you click I disapprove then its a red.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks! I finally found it..
Slight Correction...Its the upper right hand corner, next to the post #...
Correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks! I finally found it..
Slight Correction...Its the upper right hand corner, next to the post #...
GCAmigo
02-05 01:50 PM
The response doesn't address retrogression.. the focus is purely on illegal immigrants..
more...
akela_topchi
08-07 11:31 PM
I fully agree with the intent of this thread..
Those who do not agree with IV agenda and want to run their own agenda here are free to create their own forum and pursue their agenda there.
Everyday people come up with different divisive agenda. Enough is enough...
We cannot take it anymore...
Founders of IV and those who believe in IV don't do it just for themselves. We are fighting for betterment and for the relief of the whole community.
We should challenge those who divide us - whether they are outsiders or insiders. If insiders don't believe in our mission, they are no longer insiders. They are outsiders and dealt with the way we will deal with anyone from NumbersUSA trying to divide us... If banning such people works, I am all for it!
Let them go and start their own groups.. lawsuits and civil action or whatever...
If people are here to divide, we are no longer going to be silent spectators.
Enough is enough!
We stand united in our fight for relief to IV community.
Those who do not agree with IV agenda and want to run their own agenda here are free to create their own forum and pursue their agenda there.
Everyday people come up with different divisive agenda. Enough is enough...
We cannot take it anymore...
Founders of IV and those who believe in IV don't do it just for themselves. We are fighting for betterment and for the relief of the whole community.
We should challenge those who divide us - whether they are outsiders or insiders. If insiders don't believe in our mission, they are no longer insiders. They are outsiders and dealt with the way we will deal with anyone from NumbersUSA trying to divide us... If banning such people works, I am all for it!
Let them go and start their own groups.. lawsuits and civil action or whatever...
If people are here to divide, we are no longer going to be silent spectators.
Enough is enough!
We stand united in our fight for relief to IV community.
2010 The world#39;s tallest horse
gagbag
06-14 09:06 PM
Any one
more...
LostInGCProcess
03-03 12:53 PM
jung.lee,I'd appreciate if you could please respond to my PM whenever you can. Thanks.
hair Wild horse research: On
piyu7444
08-23 11:14 PM
raysaikat thanks a lot!
more...
veereddy
10-01 05:31 PM
Did anybody fly recently in Lufthansa to India? I wanted to know whether you need transit visa.
I have booked the tickets in Lufthansa to india in Dec.
My travel agent says you dont need transit visa if you have AP.
Since i have time now, i can apply nowif needed.
Also please give me the details about the appln forms to apply for the transit visa.
please advise.
I came back via Frankfurt on Lufthansa last month, on AP no problems.
I have booked the tickets in Lufthansa to india in Dec.
My travel agent says you dont need transit visa if you have AP.
Since i have time now, i can apply nowif needed.
Also please give me the details about the appln forms to apply for the transit visa.
please advise.
I came back via Frankfurt on Lufthansa last month, on AP no problems.
hot More Horse Coloring Pages
maheshf
01-24 03:32 PM
I need urgent advice from you. As you know my wife is on F1 visa and completed most of her credit hours needed by school. She has get only 1 credit hr to complete the course. However, that�s below 9 hr full time student status. She has been asked to register for additional 8 hrs..and pay tuition fee accordingly ( > 8K). Which I think is unreasonable. They told her that if she doesn�t register by tomorrow they have to report it to INS. She told them that she has EAD..there answer doesn�t matter in order to remain in school and F1 visa she has to register.
My questions is:
1) Can she continue working on her Thesis on her EAD and AP ?
2) What will happen to her f1 if she use EAD
In response to these questions my Lawyer said
1.) yes, she can continue to be a student as an adjustment applicant � she can work using the EAD and travel using the AP.
2) she is basically no longer an F-1 because she has demonstrated immigrant intent by filing the adjustment. Which is fine � she has valid legal status as an adjustment applicant and can work with the EAD and travel with the AP.
What do pro�s think..:)
My questions is:
1) Can she continue working on her Thesis on her EAD and AP ?
2) What will happen to her f1 if she use EAD
In response to these questions my Lawyer said
1.) yes, she can continue to be a student as an adjustment applicant � she can work using the EAD and travel using the AP.
2) she is basically no longer an F-1 because she has demonstrated immigrant intent by filing the adjustment. Which is fine � she has valid legal status as an adjustment applicant and can work with the EAD and travel with the AP.
What do pro�s think..:)
more...
house Canadian Horse
raju123
07-12 04:13 PM
There is no second opinion that USCIS is wrong on morale ground for July VB issue. But I am not sure technically, they are right or wrong. They interpreted the law in their convenience. Here is what I see
What ever visa left for year 2007, they requested to use for July 2007. They kept ready all pre-adjudicated applications and assigned visa numbers on July 1 (Sunday). No one can stop them to send green card approval notice for visa assigned cases later. In a rush, they assigned visa number to few cases whose security check is still pending (technically this is wrong). They realize their mistake and now checking all the cases which are assigned visa numbers on July 1 whether security check is cleared or not. They are now approving the cases (with a slow speed) whose security check is cleared and assigned visa number on July 1. They are returning visa number which are assigned to cases whose security check is not clear.
This is my understanding.
Just trying to sum up the situation from USCIS perspective...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
What ever visa left for year 2007, they requested to use for July 2007. They kept ready all pre-adjudicated applications and assigned visa numbers on July 1 (Sunday). No one can stop them to send green card approval notice for visa assigned cases later. In a rush, they assigned visa number to few cases whose security check is still pending (technically this is wrong). They realize their mistake and now checking all the cases which are assigned visa numbers on July 1 whether security check is cleared or not. They are now approving the cases (with a slow speed) whose security check is cleared and assigned visa number on July 1. They are returning visa number which are assigned to cases whose security check is not clear.
This is my understanding.
Just trying to sum up the situation from USCIS perspective...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
tattoo Horse
priderock
07-12 01:11 PM
I agree with you map_boiler. I have also seen from some other thread that some one with EB3/India/Apr 2004 PD got approval in July. If the July bulletin is void , How can they approve that ?
You are right , It looks like they approved cased with NO PD but with ready FBI check and also requested numbers for the current PD but sec check pending.
If a APR2004/EB3/India can get approval after Jul 2 , How can they reject EB3/INDIA/DEC2003 but filed on Jul2 ?
Returning numbers raise whole lot of questions. It remains to be seen how they try to untangle this mess.
You are right , It looks like they approved cased with NO PD but with ready FBI check and also requested numbers for the current PD but sec check pending.
If a APR2004/EB3/India can get approval after Jul 2 , How can they reject EB3/INDIA/DEC2003 but filed on Jul2 ?
Returning numbers raise whole lot of questions. It remains to be seen how they try to untangle this mess.
more...
pictures Cut out one horse pattern and
Reub
February 4th, 2004, 08:27 PM
Nikon put itself "On The Ropes", by not paying attention to what the market wants. Canon have consistently caught them with their pants down with the D60, 300D and the mkII. Very kind of Canon to leave Nikon anywhere near 30% of the table scraps. who says the blokes at Canon don't have a heart?
dresses Horse
UNFLUX
05-21 10:43 AM
looks good dan, even for 30min. I love the colors too, and the angle you chose is nice. I don't think you did something poor at all. ;)
more...
makeup Horse Wallpaper
mhathi
02-19 04:02 PM
I wouldn't want Laloo to get his paws on my money. It is better in a Swiss account. :-)
Dude, I am sure a lot of that money in these accounts belongs to the same "Railbay Meeneester' you are talking about..
:D
Dude, I am sure a lot of that money in these accounts belongs to the same "Railbay Meeneester' you are talking about..
:D
girlfriend Aldo, a police horse
Templarian
03-31 05:41 PM
4 Way tie? :lol:
//edit, I was joking, now it's actually a 4 way tie. :ponder:
//edit, I was joking, now it's actually a 4 way tie. :ponder:
hairstyles Horse Colouring Pictures 8
teky
10-27 09:57 AM
Guys,
Getting a residency now is very difficult. Getting a waiver now should not be that hard. I would not say it is easy but if you get a residency position, just take it. We hesitated at first but got through all the issues without any problem.
Regards,
Teky.
Getting a residency now is very difficult. Getting a waiver now should not be that hard. I would not say it is easy but if you get a residency position, just take it. We hesitated at first but got through all the issues without any problem.
Regards,
Teky.
yourvijay
11-13 04:21 PM
Hi,
I have become a PR in year 2004. Here is my experience.
Pulled my vehicle aside well ahead of the toll gate.
(I knew if i cross that toll that means i left USA.)
Informed cop/securitythat i am leaving USA for good and need to resturn I-94 to CBP. He asked me to park near the Duty free store and showed me an entrance for CBP.
CBP offcier asked the following things.
1. Where are you going ?
A. Landing to become canadian PR.
2. Will you come back ?
A. No. I will reside in Canada.
3. Give me your passport.
A. Gave him the passport (He looked at PR Visa)
4. Note down this I-94 number. For some reason if you decide to come back in less than 30days, make sure you give this number to CBP here if you dont get USA visa stamped in the passport.
Went to the canada immigration. They stamped in the passport as
" LANDED IMMIGRANT AS OF 11/24/2004 ". Asked me to show the title of the car on my name (They verified that i dont have any loan pending on it).
Asked about goods to follow. I told them. I am not going to bring any thing, i will buy in canada. They asked for proof of funds. I showed bank letter and some certified checks. Thats it.
Every border has CBP. Their building will be facing to wards Canada as their main work is checking the incoming traffic. How ever its our responsibility that we reach them and submit I-94.
WELCOME TO CANADA. WISH YOU BEST OF LUCK.
I have become a PR in year 2004. Here is my experience.
Pulled my vehicle aside well ahead of the toll gate.
(I knew if i cross that toll that means i left USA.)
Informed cop/securitythat i am leaving USA for good and need to resturn I-94 to CBP. He asked me to park near the Duty free store and showed me an entrance for CBP.
CBP offcier asked the following things.
1. Where are you going ?
A. Landing to become canadian PR.
2. Will you come back ?
A. No. I will reside in Canada.
3. Give me your passport.
A. Gave him the passport (He looked at PR Visa)
4. Note down this I-94 number. For some reason if you decide to come back in less than 30days, make sure you give this number to CBP here if you dont get USA visa stamped in the passport.
Went to the canada immigration. They stamped in the passport as
" LANDED IMMIGRANT AS OF 11/24/2004 ". Asked me to show the title of the car on my name (They verified that i dont have any loan pending on it).
Asked about goods to follow. I told them. I am not going to bring any thing, i will buy in canada. They asked for proof of funds. I showed bank letter and some certified checks. Thats it.
Every border has CBP. Their building will be facing to wards Canada as their main work is checking the incoming traffic. How ever its our responsibility that we reach them and submit I-94.
WELCOME TO CANADA. WISH YOU BEST OF LUCK.
hopefullegalimmigrant
04-18 07:23 PM
You are right! I should have addressed him as Mr. President.